Labels:book | reckoner | sky | tree OCR: Following the Cumada Malting holding the Piper Court held that the possibility of change in the applicable law unfavorable to the claimant would not automatically defeat the defendant forum mon conveniens motion Piper 454 247. 102 261. The Court stated that such rigid rule would render the doctrine virtually useless" and prevent the very protection i1 was designed to afford Piper 454 U 250 102 The discretionary forum analysis likewise considers the citizenship and residence of the parties The claimant' choice of "home forum is given substantial defer- ence, but not dispositive weight. Koster 330 U.S at 524 525. 67 S,Ct at 831 832: Piper. 454 At 255. 102 at 265 266. stated by Justice Marshall Piper, [c]itizens residents of the forum deserve somewhat more deference than foreign plaintiffs, b ...
(.png)
